Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arab conquest of Kaikan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 16:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arab conquest of Kaikan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no point in keeping this article along with its parent article Umayyad campaigns in India, when there are no sources explicitly covering this event as "Arab conquest of Kaikan", the source cited in the lead for it nowhere mentions this event as the title. Another problem with orginal researched articles is their defined timeline, despite having no source for the hoax timelines the authors of these articles love to furnish their own preferred timeline of one, two or even three centuries. The article topic also seems to lack notability and significant coverage as there are many uncertainty and unknown belligerents. Based Kashmiri (talk) 08:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Isn't this Hilarious that you created urself fake Fictional war articles of Bengali Pala empire (while claim to be Kashmiri) and selecting every fine article for deletion~~ DeepstoneV (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC) — DeepstoneV (talk · contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of AdityaNakul (talk · contribs). Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nice try. But commenting on me won't work per WP:PA & WP:AADP. Also you should check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohammad Umar Ali, best regards. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 10:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article is one sided and it doesn't contain neutral pov because the article don't says about the earliest defeat suffered by arabs during their conquest of Kikan. It doesn't show early 3,4 Jat victories, Not a WP:NPOV. पापा जी (talk) 04:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)पापा जी (talk) 04:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.